Saw this today in the Daily Grist newsletter:

The Weight of the World
Exposure to chemicals could contribute to obesity, studies find

Obesity is largely blamed on calories (too many) and exercise (too little), but recent studies suggest that chemical exposure may also pack on pounds. And it’s tough to diet from so-called “obesogens,” which show up in everything from pesticides to food containers. Chemicals found to produce more and larger fat cells in mice include waterproof-paint ingredient tributyltin; diethylstilbestrol, which was widely prescribed to pregnant women from the 1940s to the ’60s; and estrogen-like bisphenol A, which showed up in 95 percent of people tested by one recent study. BPA promotes fat-cell activity in utero, producing “lifetime effects” that occur at “phenomenally small levels” of exposure, says biological sciences professor Frederick vom Saal; he dismisses the chemical industry’s claim that BPA poses no health risk as a “blatant lie.” The production and use of BPA has quadrupled in the last couple of decades, in roughly the same timeline that obesity has noticeably risen. Coincidence? Fat chance.

BPA is actually used more in baby bottles than water bottles. Along with a number of other plastics, it uses the #7 recycling symbol. Most water bottles use Polyethylene Terephthalate (PETE), which will show the #1 recycling symbol. While PETE won’t make you fat (as far as we know), it may kill you, because bottles made from PETE may leach DEHA and acetaldehyde, both classified as carcinogens.

Technorati Tags: health risks of plastic, water bottles, BPA, PETE, obesity, chemical exposure, health